[Borges]

MvM does not prevent amending the Constitution.

[goldstategop]

Or overruling it with a law that takes away this power the judiciary has assumed for itself by a finding it has no warrant in the Constitution.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[Wonder Warthog]

"MvM does not prevent amending the Constitution."

No, it doesn't. But MvM should never have been decided the way it was. It was a sheer usurpation of power by John Marshall. The correct response, as I said, should have been a recommendation from the Supreme Court laying out the existence of a Constitutional conflict (or lack of authority), and let the Congress correct the situation via. the amendment process.

[FreedomCalls]

MvM does not prevent amending the Constitution.

An amendment would be pointless since lacking MvM oversight, Congress could do what they wanted regardless of what restraints the Constitution or a new amendment would impose.