Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop
That's why we should limit them to one term. However Hamilton explicitly stated that a Judiciate would have to declare a law void if it was repugnant to the Constitutional. If you intepret that otherwise then perhaps you're seeing a penumbra? :-)
68 posted on 07/09/2005 4:15:18 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Borges
Hamilton meant ultra vires as I did. That's the only sort of power British and until recently, Canadian courts where allowed. Other than that Parliament was the last word on the nature of the law.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
75 posted on 07/09/2005 4:19:15 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson