Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

Borges said it beautifully, "The amendment process is the final word on the content not the interpretation." Change the content and the point is mute.


132 posted on 07/09/2005 5:07:03 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets; Wonder Warthog; Borges
To: Wonder Warthog

Borges said it beautifully, "The amendment process is the final word on the content not the interpretation." Change the content and the point is mute.

132 posted by spunkets






Even Amendments must be compatible with the principles of the Constitution.

Marshall said as much in M v M, -- that any law 'repugnant', - is null & void.

Theoretically, the SCOTUS could 'strike down' an Amendment as unconstitutional. -- And that exact point was argued before them in 1919, in a move to nullify the 18th.
142 posted on 07/09/2005 5:27:06 PM PDT by musanon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets
""The amendment process is the final word on the content not the interpretation." Change the content and the point is mute."

And if the new content makes the current interpretation impossible, it also changes the interpretation as well. Borges is wrong.

And the word is "moot", not "mute". Mute is someone unable to speak.

157 posted on 07/09/2005 5:50:16 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson