To: Wonder Warthog
Borges said it beautifully, "The amendment process is the final word on the content not the interpretation." Change the content and the point is mute.
To: spunkets; Wonder Warthog; Borges
To: Wonder Warthog
Borges said it beautifully, "The amendment process is the final word on the content not the interpretation." Change the content and the point is mute.
132 posted by spunkets
Even Amendments must be compatible with the principles of the Constitution.
Marshall said as much in M v M, -- that any law 'repugnant', - is null & void.
Theoretically, the SCOTUS could 'strike down' an Amendment as unconstitutional. -- And that exact point was argued before them in 1919, in a move to nullify the 18th.
142 posted on
07/09/2005 5:27:06 PM PDT by
musanon
To: spunkets
""The amendment process is the final word on the content not the interpretation." Change the content and the point is mute." And if the new content makes the current interpretation impossible, it also changes the interpretation as well. Borges is wrong.
And the word is "moot", not "mute". Mute is someone unable to speak.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson