Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva

Scalia has explicitly stated he see no problem with Marbury Vs Madison. He called it a 'plagiarism of Hamilton in the Fedaralist'


123 posted on 07/09/2005 4:52:35 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

I don't think that I understand what you are saying, he called what "plagarism of Hamilton."


125 posted on 07/09/2005 4:55:01 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

Ok, I see what you are saying. Scalia likes Marbury vs Madison. Well, that may be but he doesn't thing that Marbury vs. Madison applies to bad law.


127 posted on 07/09/2005 4:56:57 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
Scalia has explicitly stated he see no problem with Marbury Vs Madison. He called it a 'plagiarism of Hamilton in the Fedaralist'

I agree with Scalia. I didn't always. But I agree only if Scalia recognizes that Marbury also holds that the excutive is under no obligation to obey rulings of the judiciary that the executive considers improper.
145 posted on 07/09/2005 5:33:02 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson