Replies

The Framers of our founding documents set up our government according to the principles of the Biblical Worldview to ensure that that can never happen.

Yes, and just as some have tried – and to an extent succeeded in – corrupting these principles so that we now see abortion as a “privacy right”, the 1st Amendment as near blanket immunity for the news media, the 2nd Amendment as a collective right, the 4th amendment as just a suggestion, the 5th amendment as a way to allow developers free reign with government enforcement of their aims, the 8th amendment as one to be ignored along with the 9th and 10th amendments.

"Yes, and just as some have tried – and to an extent succeeded in – corrupting these principles so that we now see abortion as a “privacy right”, the 1st Amendment as near blanket immunity for the news media, the 2nd Amendment as a collective right, the 4th amendment as just a suggestion, the 5th amendment as a way to allow developers free reign with government enforcement of their aims, the 8th amendment as one to be ignored along with the 9th and 10th amendments."

In direct violation of the Constitution - (which they swore on the Bible that they would uphold) - these UNconstitutional "findings" you mentioned are all examples of what happens when 5 lawyers in black robes get free rein to impose their subjective whims and/or consciences on the rest of us.

"We the people" must restore democracy by getting judicial activists out of the court system and off the SC bench. We must insist that only objective jurists who will interpret the Constitution according to its origional intent are fit to be on the SC.