True, but there are two things.
One, I noted that evolution is a very FLAWED theory. Gravity, even if it is a theory, is a very solid theory by comparison.
Second, gravity is unlike evolution in the fact that it can be OBSERVED. Evolution cannot - as it is purported to take years upon years upon years - be observed in the same capacity.
It isn't.
Gravity, even if it is a theory, is a very solid theory by comparison.
The theory of gravity is actually far less complete than the theory of evolution.
Second, gravity is unlike evolution in the fact that it can be OBSERVED.
That is the law rather than the theory.
On the contrary, the theory of gravity is very tenuous. And most scientists couldn't pick a more established theory than evoution.
Second, gravity is unlike evolution in the fact that it can be OBSERVED. Evolution cannot - as it is purported to take years upon years upon years - be observed in the same capacity.
The effect of gravity can be seen, the theory is much more complex. And, for the record, evolution has been observed many times, which makes me wonder why you would bother to post your nonsense if you are so ignorant of the actual science. A religious agenda, perhaps?
Doesn't matter if you say it in caps or not. You didn't back up your assertion that it is a "flawed, pseudo-scientific theory" with any kind of evidence whatsoever.
Do so now, please.