Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lexinom

I stand by #62.


106 posted on 07/09/2005 9:16:28 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: paulat
Understood. It was a good clarification.

You understand the knee-jerk reaction people will have reading #29 on its own (without #62). The rape-incest argument is pretty standard diversionary fare with the pro-aborts. Your point, otoh, was merely that the mother did not "invite" pregnancy in these cases. Your point was not (as is usually the case when rape is brough up) that THEREFORE the baby must die.

107 posted on 07/09/2005 9:21:55 PM PDT by Lexinom (http://www.abort73.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson