Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

"Please read the rest of the statement and then you explain how you would defeat the enemy and you're expertise on identification of the enemy?"

We'll defeat them the same way we've always defeated terrorists.

"If one can't identify through separation then the only alternative is to group and treat them all like enemy until proved they are not."

Now you explain how, if my country today starts treating a million and a half of our people as 'the enemy' as you suggest that would be anything other than the biggest boost Al Qaeda has ever received.


384 posted on 07/08/2005 5:00:58 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]


To: Canard
"We'll defeat them the same way we've always defeated terrorists."

That sounds like a liberal escape route. How would you defeat them? Not some generic subjective answer.

They would have nothing to worry about if they prove they're not the enemy. I wish they would all claim to be Al Qaeda because that makes them a free target.
392 posted on 07/08/2005 5:17:16 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson