Replies

I have tangled with Kuehn12 a couple of times, and for the life of me i cannot determine whether he is a clintonista, a troll, a Chinese freeper, or just a genuine pacificist who truly (though wrongly) believes holding hands and singing carols will bring global peace and universal harmony (not to mention cause orchids to bloom from salted earth). Either way he is pretty much harmless, and actually cute in a twisted sort of way (there was one post where he claimed that China was not quasi-fascist because, and i quote, 'there are no photographs of soldiers goose-stepping.' Needless to say i soon posted a bunch of photos showing Chinese soldiers doing a quick-step that would make Chairman Mao leap with joy....)

All in all he is harmless .....a tad bit tantamount to a college football team having a wolverine as a mascot ....in essence a gimmick.

I know now that it is impossible to have a civil exchange with you sir. Short of me demonizing those that I disagree with would be the only way to prove that I am not a troll. I guess then I must find a comfortable spot under a bridge. God forbid, that someone would rather seek peace than war. Is a crime for which I should be hanged for. My second crime is fairness. That wouldn't be a attribute you possess, and one that I should be eviscerated for in your opinion. I have made my views plain, but you and some other people on this site tend to twist them to fit some warp world view.

I have said we should confront the Chinese and convince them that aggression is never an option. For instance, I suggested that we reinstate the lend lease program for the Taiwanese and I said we should form some kind of NATO like organization in the Pacific. I guess because I didn't call for preemptive nuclear strike, therefore I am a tree hugging, fruit and nut, smoke some weed liberal nut.

I have said that I wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton for some of the same reason many on this site have enumerated. I have just subtract the venom found in your words. My position with respect of the terrorist is not dissimilar than yours.

But your sir will never look at the totality of my posts, you just choose to resort to a personal attack. Many on this site are so blinded by their hate for the Clintons they can't construct logical argument only attacks. The Clintons are destined for the dust pan of history, and they aren't the source of all evil in the world. They are just the most self serving duel I have ever seen in politics. You notice I didn't call names or invoke stupid imagery to make my point.