Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

Well... in that specific case, it's you who's being subjective. :-) But I know what you mean.

Is it talking about terrorist brilliance to say they're kinda making maximum hay out of their (twisted) cause? I dunno, don't want to argue.


3,274 posted on 07/07/2005 10:15:06 AM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3255 | View Replies ]


To: lainie
It's about stating fact absent commentator or reporter opinion and they use key words to exaggerate their points of view. Example,"horrific" instead of just common language. They then use so-called experts to justify their message. "We're losing Iraq", the MSM has been trying to imply and they bring every Clintonian out of the woodwork to make the same claim. Now watch, the message will not be how UK retaliates but how everyone is vulnerable. The MSM needs to once again focus on the terrorist being evil, not brilliant.
We're on the same side with our dislike of terrorist but I probably differ with you on my opinion of the MSM and that's ok, no argument needed.
3,329 posted on 07/07/2005 10:34:07 AM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson