[RadioAstronomer]

Even when scientists disprove science they find a way to spin their agenda.

You are not a scientist are you. Do you know any? Or are you just quoting some creationist website claptrap?

And creationists, as I am, will continue to doubt skewed scientific truth no matter how much evidence you present.

Umm..skewed scientific truth? How would you know?

What chaps me, is that my taxes fund scientific research attempting to disprove Christianity so they can strike the word GOD from U.S. history.

Pure codswallop.

[RightWingAtheist]

[Doctor Stochastic]

But his opinion is shared by many of the anti-science crowe. Of course, some think science is out to disprove Scientology or Islam rather than Christianity, but they are of the same ilk.

[BedRock]

Darwin at least had the openness of mind and the humbleness to give credit to a superior "Creator" of his proposed TOE.

He stated that whether life began as two or one he wasn't sure, but the result of his TOE had produced things amazingly beautiful to the human eye. (paraphrased, not an actual quote)

I give Darwin more respect as a scientist than I do most of the so-called "ones in the know" who attempt to post to articles concerning the TOE on FR today.

At least he was willing to debate and consider all things with an open mind.