Yes, but investigations have to yield evidence. You're asserting facts with no evidence, and on this thread we're told that he must "prove" his innocence.
After there are suspicious circumstances there is an investigation. There are SUSPICIONS first.
You're asserting facts with no evidence,
Really? I said REPEATEDLY that the circumstances are SUSPICIOUS. Any facts I've given are part of public record. I also said that no one but Schiavo knows what happened. Post 539 for one. Don't try to twist what I've said.