Of course there is ZERO evidence that this particular allegation is true.
Just as there is no proof that he did not cause the collapse.
Think of what you're saying, man.
"Just as there is no proof that he did not cause the collapse"?
That's absurd. Worse than that, it's doublespeak nonsense.
Let's be clear on one thing: the autopsy report did not in any way conclude what caused the collapse.
I've read it a few times, and the one thing it did do was thoroughly trash MS's medmal theory that the jury bought.
They dont know what happened to Ms. Holloway either, but it is clear there is foul play.
If you are going to accuse someone of a crime, it is incumbent upon you to provide the evidence to support the allegation. You cannot prove a negative. For that matter, there is no proof that you did not cause her collapse. See how ridiculous this becomes?