Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: malakhi
Sure people can refuse treatment. Even food and water.

What constitutes a "refusal" in that case? Seven-year-old second-hand hearsay? No. Must be obvious, must be by the person, the person must be sane and conscious and the request must be made at the current time.

Contracts -- advance medical directives -- where they allow the withdrawal of basic sustenance, food and water. Or where they allow injections or active therapies that cause or speed death -- those are death contracts. Assisted suicide. Illegal, immoral, a denial of basic civl rights under the US Constitution.

370 posted on 07/07/2005 5:06:56 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
Seven-year-old second-hand hearsay?

It wasn't second-hand, and it wasn't, legally, 'hearsay'.

Assisted suicide. Illegal, immoral, a denial of basic civl rights under the US Constitution.

That's your opinion. I happen to think that the right to refuse medical treatment is pretty fundamental. There is no qualitative difference between the state forcing a person to have a feeding tube, and the state forcing schoolchildren to take ritalin. Either both are acceptable, or neither are acceptable.

385 posted on 07/07/2005 6:39:16 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson