Posted on 07/05/2005 1:20:54 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
Go, Chucky! Don't forget to wear the rainbow bracelet and green polo shirt for the cameras.
Jump!
Go on, jump!
JUMP!
What business does Schumer have asking nominees whether they are married let alone whether they are gay!
so schumer has just made it official:
it is the Democrat "gay" Party.
A judicial candidate cannot sit before these pompous asses and give his opinion on any of it. He/She will be expected to rule by law impartially. The elitists trying to corner the candidates on beliefs and thoughts could disqualify him from certain cases in the future. There are plenty of ways to conduct a respectful intelligent hearing for any person
named by the President of the United States. The slanderous jihadists need a lesson in manners and obligations to the citizens of America. Grandstanding will be done by the political egotists needing to read about themselves in the media. It is a sickness.
In a time of war, in a time of terrorism, in a time of budget battles -- leave it to the Dems to make "gay marriage" their top priority.
What the Dems don't wish to acknowledged is that when this was a referendum last year in the election, all states voted down gay marriage. Including two that went for Kerry.
It's a losing issue for them in just about every state in the union, not just "red" states.
remember part of their base is comprised of remnants of the blue collar union workers that used to be their main, as well as minorities. Both are solidly opposed to this agenda.
Schumer always has looked, sounded and acted, extremely light in the loafers, but until that homosexual marriage statement I just thought he was a sissy.
Wonder who the same sex soul mate he wishes to woo and wed, might be?
It's looking more and more like the only appointee the democrat senators will be satisfied with is the infamous Judge Greer.
Well said. BTW, do I detect a present or former member of the 1st Armored Division in your screen name?
Really?
When did you stop beating your wife?
Are you now or have you ever been a member of the KKK?
Did you ever let a woman drown in 6 ft. of water while under the influenc of alcohol?
In time of war,it is always wise to watch your back.
I agree. Considering the way marriage admendments were voted on in the last election, I have to say that this is gonna cost him some votes. Boy, the dems can pick some winners. (not)
roflmao!!!!! lol; you caught me totally off guard. Yep. Best to watch one's back.
"How much of the Whitehouse silverware is in your Chappaqua home?"
The field is soooooo crowded, though.
Homosexual Agenda + Moral Absolutes Ping - a Definite Two-fer.
So little Chuckie is letting it all hang out, is he? So in order for the treasonous party - I mean Democrats - to vote for a new SCOTUS team player, he or she has to be pro-sodomarriage?
They are itching for a fight, aren't they.
Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.
It doesn't suprise me at all! It's mainly Christian voters that sent any of the 14 Senators who voted against the 1996 DOMA and most of them are still there.
Senators voted AGAINST the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act:
Akaka (D-HI)
Boxer (D-CA)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerrey (D-NE)
Kerry (D-MA)
Moseley-Braun (D-IL)
Moynihan (D-NY)
Pell (D-RI)
Robb (D-VA)
Simon (D-IL)
Wyden (D-OR)
Pu-leeze don't throw me in that br'ar patch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.