Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: musanon
You:"...leads us to the fact that total prohibitions are abridgments/infringements of our rights to life, liberty, or property."
Me: That is a declaration: prohibitions=abridgments.
You: Of course it is. How redundant of you.

You, a few sentences later: That I made such a "definition" is YOUR logical fallacy, not mine.

You, sir, cannot get your story, your definitions, nor your logic straight.

I yield the field as a fruitless exercise in banging my head against a wall of indomitable self-righteousness, inability to respond rationally to counter-evidence, and invincible ignorance. Since you have decided you are correct, despite refutation by at least two others on this thread, and nothing of fact, logic or example will sway you, I am done wasting my time.

502 posted on 07/09/2005 4:35:08 PM PDT by LexBaird (tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird

I agree, you were wasting your time in arguing for a nonexistent 'power to prohibit'.


504 posted on 07/09/2005 4:46:48 PM PDT by musanon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson