Uh... already done. There's a group of drug users who are able to afford their habits without resorting to crime. There's a separate and distinct group of drug users who are not. If the price declines, the former group increases in size while the latter group decreases. Is that not obvious? Would you like me to prove that the sun rises in the East and that 2+2 equals 4 next?
Once you've done that, I'll bother responding to the rest of your post. In the meantime, I'll await your evidence.
Here, allow me to translate that from Idiot into English for you: "I'm getting tired of getting my ass consistently thrashed in this debate for which I am clearly woefully unequipped, so I'll declare victory and slink away with my tail between my legs, in the probably futile hope that nobody will notice."
So you know of a group of meth users who can afford their habits without resorting to crime? Just how big is this group?
There's a separate and distinct group of drug users who are not.
Ah, thank you for admitting it.
Still waiting for you to prove your statement.