Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Indy Pendance
I suggested to go after the supply, you told me not to call the cops if my house was burglarized.

Sure. It fits your logic. Instead of trying to stop burglars, cops should instead go after all the fences, because then the burglars wouldn't have anyone to sell to, right? Your house being broken into is strictly small time, not worthy of police attention when they have bigger fish to catch.

What is your solution to get drugs off the streets that will be effective and permanent?

There is no more an effective and permanent solution to street drugs than there is for mugging, theft and black marketeering will always exist. The answer certainly isn't to ignore it. The ACLU wouldn't like my approach. Something along the lines of injecting the convicted street dealer with all the drugs found on him at the time of arrest.

174 posted on 07/05/2005 11:49:47 AM PDT by LexBaird (tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird

I'll tell you what, the next time a fence robs my house, I won't call the cops. Drug suppliers market and sell the drugs to smaller 'distributors'. Get rid of suppliers, the smaller sellers won't have a product to sell. I never said to ignore the small sellers, you inferred it. I said, the way we were going about it isn't working and we need an effective and permanent different approach or we'll just continue pouring millions of dollars down a black hole. The current practice of arresting small dealers is not detering the sale of street drugs.


181 posted on 07/05/2005 11:59:52 AM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson