I dont think they are genetic at all, as shown by how much women have changed since the 1950's, they mostly used to fit into the mold of Mrs Cleaver, now they are aggressive, run you off the road, and most women dont even wear skirts anymore, or even own one.
As far as being dissatisfied, when women outnumber men in college by 60% or more, and when all the high paid professions are now mostly female, it is inevitable that there will be a shortage of men who make more or who are better educated than women - it is basic math. Therefore, Women have to "change" to expect less from a man, to expect a less educated, a less paid partner. The one that owns the gold makes the rules, and women who make more than husbands will be the ones in charge, and men will have to do the more meaningless tasks in a marraige because womens time will be worth so much more than a mans time. When a woman manager or physician or attorney or biologist, etc comes home from a long day at work making mega bucks, she will expect dinner and a clean house.
I think you will probably be right in your expectations - when the man is able to carry their "fetus" to term on his liver.
Seriously, I don't think your vision of the future is ever going to come to pass because it flies in the face of reality. The "equal" women you are looking forward to won't have any children. This is already happening. They are being replaced, by nature, by women who will raise many children.
LOL!! You're hilarious. .. So , women's liberation means women will be more liberated and men less so?
You might see this incidently, but I think its fair to say that if the human being who produces the offspring isnt willing to stay home and take care of them, there will be far less offspring. WHich is exactly whats happening all over the Western world.
The societies that promote "tradidionalism" in family life will be the ones that take over. Sounds unfair, but... thats life!
"I dont think they are genetic at all, "
We clearly disagree on this point. And to support your arguement, you'd tell me that testosterone doesn't make a human, regardless of gender, more agressive?
I would grant you that aggression can be socialized. But the real, hard core, I want to beat your brains in at all costs aggression is generally associated with testosterone. Think I'm wrong? Try some. Or, perhaps you have?
True, but I worked in law for 8 years in NYC and most of the women were either in an unhappy relationship, or in no relationship at all. A lot of men simply don't want to deal with a woman with a demanding career (I know I don't).
When a woman manager or physician or attorney or biologist, etc comes home from a long day at work making mega bucks, she will expect dinner and a clean house.
She can keep on waiting. Even if she finds a guy like that (and they are out there), in no time she will be sexually frustrated by him. A woman, on balance, can not be consistently sexually excited and fulfilled by a man who isn't a dominant male (that's not to say domineering, which is a negative trait).
True, but I worked in law for 8 years in NYC and most of the women were either in an unhappy relationship, or in no relationship at all. A lot of men simply don't want to deal with a woman with a demanding career (I know I don't).
When a woman manager or physician or attorney or biologist, etc comes home from a long day at work making mega bucks, she will expect dinner and a clean house.
She can keep on waiting. Even if she finds a guy like that (and they are out there), in no time she will be sexually frustrated by him. A woman, on balance, can not be consistently sexually excited and fulfilled by a man who isn't a dominant male (that's not to say domineering, which is a negative trait).