Well if that is the case, you ought to follow an argument, if you can call it that, before making pontifications. This person WAS insulting females by saying that divorces are only the faulf of the women. THAT deserves a bone-headed monikker, in my opinion. Let's not be too sensitive here. Everyone should be able to take a little repartee.
I make pontifications.
They are Nestle tollhouse pontifications.
They are so yummy.
"Well if that is the case, you ought to follow an argument"
Hmmmm... so there is a context to the rule? Personal attacks are allowed when you decide they are? Is that a right given to the women here, or do we all just decide when it's appropriate to attack?