Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawrence O'Donnell: Rove's I-did-not-inhale Defense
Huffington Post ^ | 7-4-05 | Lawrence O'Donnell

Posted on 07/04/2005 3:17:36 PM PDT by STARWISE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Larry certainly has a fixation


1 posted on 07/04/2005 3:17:40 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

O'Donnell is a nutcase shill for the DNC. He is so full of himself that he expects Rove to answer all his questions and, when Rovee doesn't, he claims Rove's silence means Rove is guilty of whatever crackpot claims O'Donnell has made. Sorry, Larry, but it doesn't work that way -- save with cretins -- a/k/a Democrats.


2 posted on 07/04/2005 3:20:05 PM PDT by Lunkhead_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I really wonder who wants Bush impeached more... the MSM or the DNC.


3 posted on 07/04/2005 3:22:27 PM PDT by johnny7 (How often does a '47 Rodham require servicing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Does that mean Rove simply didn't know Valerie Plame was a covert agent?


She hadn't been a covert operative since her own husband outed her. This guy's whacko.


4 posted on 07/04/2005 3:23:57 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

CREEPY LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!1


5 posted on 07/04/2005 3:24:03 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

There's no difference.


6 posted on 07/04/2005 3:24:36 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Notice he doesn't accuse Rove of leaking Plame's name. So what's the crime, Larry?


7 posted on 07/04/2005 3:25:35 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Yeah, only Democrats should be allowed to speak to the press. Republicans will be accused of crimes.


8 posted on 07/04/2005 3:26:29 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunkhead_01
He is so full of himself that he expects Mr/Ms X to answer all his questions and, when Mr/Ms X doesn't, he claims Mr/Ms X silence means Mr/Ms X is guilty of whatever crackpot

Sound like anyone we know on FoxNews?

9 posted on 07/04/2005 3:26:49 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lunkhead_01

From what I heard, Rove talked to Cooper, but only AFTER Plame's name was already disclosed. So it's hardly an "I did not inhale defense." It's more like an "I did not disclose defense." And disclosure is the fundamental requirement of the statute.

It's interesting though that O'Donnell characterizes it as an "I did not inhale defense."

Afterall, we all know who it was who did not inhale.


10 posted on 07/04/2005 3:26:52 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

I thought the Cubans had outted her a long time before her later outting.


11 posted on 07/04/2005 3:27:30 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; cyncooper; small voice in the wilderness
See my post #6 on THIS THREAD to understand why I concluded this Lawrence O'Donnell is a jerk.
12 posted on 07/04/2005 3:28:48 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Interesting point & good catch.


13 posted on 07/04/2005 3:29:22 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The response should have been "I did not dislose the name". Period. This "knowingly" stuff is so pre-Clinton.

Do all that disclaiming AFTER you get caught, not before.


14 posted on 07/04/2005 3:30:15 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: summer
This text he wrote here, below, is also bogus, as people on FR have posted articles from 2004 and earlier reporting that Rove had spoken to Cooper:

It is a huge admission in a case where Rove and Luskin have never, before Friday, felt compelled to say a word about Rove's contact with Cooper or anyone else involved in the case.
15 posted on 07/04/2005 3:30:53 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

"It's interesting though that O'Donnell characterizes it as an "I did not inhale defense." "

O'DUnnell has been inhaling with Aaron Sorkin again.


16 posted on 07/04/2005 3:32:52 PM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly; Brilliant
Interesting point & good catch

Even curioser? On the RSS feed from Huffington, this article came down titled "Rove's Defense Hangs On One Word." Wonder why they scrapped that?

"That depends on what the meaning of the word 'is', is..."
17 posted on 07/04/2005 3:33:14 PM PDT by timpad (The Wizard Tim - Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade, Finder of Obscurata)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

"I did not inhale"

O'Donnell is so full of hatred that he tripped himself up - I'm sure he didn't want a negative reference to Clinton.


18 posted on 07/04/2005 3:33:28 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Y-A-W-N. Mr. O'Donnell, you obviously do inhale. Get help.


19 posted on 07/04/2005 3:34:11 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (As long as Dean's the head of the D-N-C, it just looks better for the G-O-P!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunkhead_01

now he is just ignoring what is being said to fit Rove into his HE DID IT thinking.


20 posted on 07/04/2005 3:34:54 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson