Posted on 07/03/2005 4:38:32 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
My advice to the President. You and the nominee will get hammered and vilified no matter whom you pick. If the nominee were the reincarnation of both John and Thurgood Marshall, the press would portray the nominee as another Roger B. Taney. So, Mr. President, my recommendation is that you just pick the most conservative, qualified, and youngest nominee that you can. Forget the critics since there is no one you could nominate that wouldn't excite the leftist base. They have been gearing up for this battle for four years and their fund-raising depends on raising a fuss. There is no way that they will defer to Bush's choice. So, swing for the fences, Mr. Bush. Your base is there for you.
Thanks Betsy for your great insight. Let the fight commence.
Of course but then the media tends to be left wing. One thing I am thankful of in the UK at least we do have 2 national newspapers that are right wing and do not shy away from that fact. What seems to be the case from what I see of the States they pretend to be non bias when in fact the majority are left wing.
Glenn Beck was the first talk show host that I heard talk about the Terri Schiavo case...lllloooooong before this got to the MSM...
He is very close to the family and even went to their memorial service for her...he just doesn't have a national cable show to talk about it like Hannity did..
From National Review:
Its All About 9/11
The president links Iraq and al Qaeda and the usual suspects moan.
http://www.nationalreview.com/mccarthy/mccarthy200506290912.asp
Please see this. Also, Rush had a great newsletter on this and I believe there was a thread here on this.
Oh brother!!! Does she ever have that nailed down!!!
Are you kidding? Do you really think these Sunday shows CARE about the lives of our troops?
Heck no...the only way any "war news" is included is if it includes torture or some other wrongdoing...
I just heard though on Fox that ONE of the Special Forces men have made it to safety...they don't know about the other 3 though...
BTW, the ditz that is replacing Wolf Blitzer today, is exactly that---a ditz!
This may be something that's widely known by people who've followed the story more closely than I, but I just learned that it was Cooper who contacted Rove.
Bork, on CNN, just said what I have been thinking for weeks. "Moderate" is nonsense in the context of a judge. The judge is to follow the law. Moderate is a political terminology. Not what the Courts are supposed to be.
I am more than challenged.
It was this way since the Washington Post was taken over by Katherine Graham.
Now there is no place but the Washington Times, which is local, with a nationally distributed weekly.
Nope, can't name an incident, because it is his "attituded" that is pompous and condescending, IMHO...
BUT, you know what, I don't mind that you disagree...different strokes for different folks...okay?
Besides, I like Laura Ingraham so much, even if I liked Mark, I wouldn't listen because he is up against her..and Glenn Beck.
Cooper is Mandy Grunwald's husband. Does anything think Rove would leak to ANYONE, let alone a rabid leftist America hater.
Hate to say I predicted as much but our Senate is made up of many ego maniacs.
I just re-read your post and you said that Mark's show will run from 9-11---lose one hour and then Rush at 12:00
What is going to be on from 11:00-12:00? Why doesn't the station just do us all a favor and run Rush LIVE then, instead of delaying it one hour?
Clinton won in 1992 with 43% of the vote and 49% of the vote in 1996. I remember Clinton whining back in 1996 that he really wanted to reach 50%.
Clinton won by a plurality....which if Webster still matters means: "the votes cast for the winning choice if this number is not more than one half of the votes cast."
Any way you look at it, a majority voted for someone OTHER THAN Bill Clinton in both 1992 (57% against Clinton) and 1996 (51% against Clinton).
A majority, not a plurality, voted to return George W. Bush to office in 2004.
Here is a statistic for you in our recent elections the Labour Party only got 35% of the vote with the conservatives receiving 33%. Yet the Labour were returned with a majority of over 60 seats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.