Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie; calcowgirl

Actually I think I said all the variations, because I have seen all the variations, people saying they preferred "Democrats", Davis or Bustamante.

I'll just watch and wait...

===

And regarding your preference of Davis, I guess you see no difference, between Davis signing a LAW, to force car manufacturers abide by impossible standards,


(see my post 19 on this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1435447/posts?page=19#19


and Arnold issuing a NONBINDING executive order, which is merely a "goal", basically doing nothing, except giving lip service to the issue, while he is doing real things, which helps CA business.

"Schwarzenegger has simply signed a nonbinding executive order, which seeks to reduce the state's greenhouse-gas emissions to 1990 levels in 15 years through various means, including tailpipe restrictions already in place and increased reliance on renewable energy such as wind and solar power."

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0606/p01s02-usgn.html


35 posted on 07/02/2005 4:23:49 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
I have never said that Davis didn't belong to the same corrupt cabal of investors at the NRDC that Arnold does.

Quite the contrary.

38 posted on 07/02/2005 4:28:12 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Your implication that Arnold's EO is not important is ludicrous. It will become law sooner or later, with the help of his Democrat allies.

San Diego Union-Tribune, June 2, 2005

This week, the state Assembly passed legislation that would require a 7 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2010. Also, the lawmaker who in 2002 authored legislation that will force automakers to produce cleaner cars says industry may be the next target.

Assemblywoman Fran Pavley, D-Agoura Hills, plans to rework her AB 32 to implement the governor's initiative and perhaps establish pollution limits on stationary sources, much like her law targeting cars. "The vision seems to be there," she said of the governor's directive. "Now we need specifics, enforceability and accountability."

You haven't forgotten about Arnold pushing through the Sierra Nevada Conservancy, have you? While you waited until it was already passed to voice any opposition, I am wondering why you don't take that as a lesson and speak out against this one now. Instead, I see you making excuses for it, trying to imply that it is only a target, ya di ya di ya. That, in itself, is telling.
39 posted on 07/02/2005 4:42:03 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson