Posted on 06/30/2005 10:30:49 PM PDT by truth_seeker
I hope the rest of the war goes as well for them. They're belligerent, but not very bright.
"Thanks to the blood of the martyrs,..."
Yep, Jihadist speak for sure.
If the hostages had been Israelis, the Mossad would have executed this guy a long time ago. We should learn from them.
That's a good picture. Makes me want to shave the new president to see if there's such a pronounced cleft.
And atheist. Don't forget the atheistic paradises of Stalin, Hitler and Pol Pot.
Beg to differ, but the Japanese were pretty damn fanatical. The "Rape of Nanking", the kamikazes, and hundreds of our soldiers who were summarily beheaded after capture were almost unprecedented in the level of cruelty the Japanese army displayed -- heck, the Japanese government envisioned sending every man, woman, and child into battle if it came to that. The firebombing of Tokyo cured the civilian population of any fanaticism they had. We haven't come close to approaching the amount of death and destruction we inflicted (rightfully) on the Japanese in terms of the current conflict.
But you are right - there is neither skill nor civilization in the Middle East....
Death Cult mumbo-jumbo.
I guess I should put that in quotes - "take back". IIRC, this was what precipitated the Iran-Iraq war (that and an assassination attempt on Tariq Aziz). I'd have to go back and read up on my history of that war, but I believe that control of the Shatt al-Arab waterway has been in dispute since the 1970's because it's essential to both country's oil production.
"Death Cult mumbo-jumbo."
Definitely Death Cult. However, at this time I'm more inclined to say that this Iranian Jihadist Code Talk.
Interesting thought, hadn't yet occurred to me. Lurch is supposed to be the great debater, and except for the Lazio/Clinton debacle, Hillary! has never had to participate in debates. Watching "F'n" and the Hildabeast "debate" in the '08 primaries will be a popcorn event!
"In one night, the martyrs strode down a path of 100 years."
Unfortunatley, it was 100 years backwards in time.
Too late. Pakistan already has them. Pakistan will retaliate if we nuke Iran. They won't retaliate if we use conventional weapons to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons.
I am not one of those who is always thinking and talking about the anti-Christ, but when I saw this guys picture the other day, the thought popped into my mind. This is the anti-Christ!
I'm not claiming they weren't fanatics. (The guys at the Alamo were fanatics, too). Just that they had built a civilization. They had steel mills and designed torpedoes and massive battleships. The Muddled East gets paid for oil they do not even extract themselves to buy junker aircraft that they cannot fly against us. As a foe or a friend, I'll take the Japanese over these Islamidiots any day.
When they put the guy with the red circle around his head from the original picture, side by side, with the "elected" pres, the schnozola's and ears don't match.
These two pictures look like the same person.
I'm experiencing Deja'Vu, we have high gas prices, the idiots in Iran are making noises. But we don't have Carter in the whitehouse this time........
this would be my comeback to this moron, if I had a chance...
Hey bunghole, you have an American Army on your Western border (within 4 hours of Tehran) and an American Army on your Eastern Border (where you dont have many people on the ground). Both are battle tested and fit. What was it you said again? Dominate the world? Hell, you dont even dominate your REGION.
Yet another reason never to watch MSM. Brian Williams yesterday if you hadn't seen it:
Many Americans woke up to a curious story this morning: several of the former Iran Hostages have decided there is a stron gresemblance between Iran's new president and one of their captors more than 25 years ago. The White House and most official branches of government are ducking any substantive comment on this story, and photo analysis is going on at this and other news organizations. It is a story that will be at or near the top of our broadcast and certainly made for a robust debate in our afternoon editorial meeting, when several of us raised the point (I'll leave it to others to decide germaneness) that several U.S. presidents were at minimum revolutionaries, and probably were considered terrorists of their time by the Crown in England.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.