Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesbucks

Exactly right. His ties of 9/11 and Iraq are off base. Unfortunately most Americans are to naive or stupid not to realize this is a false connection. It has been proven that Iraq was not behind these attacks. Why not attack all Arab countries using this logic.


35 posted on 06/29/2005 7:27:18 AM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: doc

Most Americans can listen to a speech and understand, but I guess you can't if you think Bush was blaming Iraq for 9/11.


38 posted on 06/29/2005 7:30:36 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: doc
It has been proven that Iraq was not behind these attacks.

Did you see post #28? And just where are YOUR sources that they were not behind it?

43 posted on 06/29/2005 7:40:01 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: doc
The words used imply, but do not state. That is troubling coming from an administration supposedly banking on being straight forward and straight shooting with no mincing of words.

It's sort of fun watching those on this forum debate back and forth the ties vs the non-ties "facts". And clearly, you ask the average person on the street who watched that presentation and they will say that the President said Iraq was involved in 9/11. I asked a few this am and that is the response I got. So the words are painting a mental picture without stating it.

44 posted on 06/29/2005 7:43:42 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson