Posted on 06/28/2005 6:23:58 AM PDT by dogbarks77
You got it. I'm very angry and very dissatisfied, but I still think I helped elect the right guy.
Ugh, don't remind me. I'm a recovering Perot voter. [hanging head in shame]
"Comment #93 Removed by Moderator"
And they had a guy named that on "The Sopranos"!
Bleh... I get no respect.
"And what would you have him handle differently?"
1. Not encouraging an Illegal Invasion by low skilled workers
2. Not signing a prescription drug bill which will bankrupt us even further
3. Not signing CFR which is clearly unconst.
4. Not continuing pledges of tax dollars to foregin regimes
5. Not coddling the Saudis.
Want more??????
As compared to what? Say the DNC??? The MSM???
I think you may have overstated your case.
#91: That was a very well reasoned response to Yapping Puppy. But a waste of time. Just slap him with a newspaper and go about your business. He likes to lift his leg and create troll puddles around here.
As we found out, Carter isn't very likeable when things aren't going his way.
LOL!
Well, check out what this guy said here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1431900/posts?page=6#6
Yeah, what you said!
Oh, haha. We tolerate a little more than they do, but we have our limits. I love pointing that out to zot bait who come in here demanding the right to tear things down like the communists do in the public square.
Good morning, friend.
Did the aroma of Troolaanus, bring you to this thread.
"Ugh, don't remind me. I'm a recovering Perot voter. [hanging head in shame]"
LOL! You're forgiven. We've all grown up quite a bit since then; especially since we have places like FR to Get The Word Out these days about those unscrupulous Liberals/Progressives/Socialists/Democrats!
I think Ross's heart was in the right place...but what a kookburger! And Nader did his share to make the 2004 election much closer than it rightfully should have been.
Though I wished his number were higher
As less they are the 25% aprroval rating that JIMMY CARTER HAD
Heads would be exploding all over libbie land!
When someone starts off quoting CNN I take a right hand turn to counteract the extreme jerk to the left.
Latest Conference Board survey rises to a 3-year high in June; May revised higher.
"The people who've been here for a while can probably smell them as they are registering."
Real conservatives never post a WMD from the mediots and defend it. (see my tagline for definition of WMD)
If the troll stays around, it will say something like:
1. I voted for GW xx times, and he has disappointed me or I will never vote for him again.
2. I'm am a real conservative republican. However, I will never vote nor support GW again.
Then, the WMD posted attracts the usual crowd of GW haters.
When the above happens, the poster is a troll or a trolling mole.
CNN. Nuff said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.