I would be willing to contribute to that fund, and to the one for the next residence he moves to. Also, for the other four "justices" who sided with Souter.
In fact, it may be more useful than that.
Admittedly, the five who have the vote on this prospective Eminent Domain action would likely buckle under to ferocious political pressure, and simply deny the action. Should that not happen, by some miracle, then the corporation determined to press this action would have to survive likely years of court action and appeals.
Even with that, they would then have to assemble the talent necessary to not only build the motel/restaurant/museum, but also the requisite talent to successfully run the enterprise. This would take serious dedication, and the many of us who have urged this action forward well understood that.
But we may be missing the big picture a bit. We need to keep our eye on the prize. It would be sweet to litigate the good judge to tears, but what we really need is to replace him and the others with constructionist judges, who realize that the Constitution of the United States was a contract protecting the citizen from the tyranny of ALL THREE branches of government, and that the judiciary has not the moral right to sweep away vast protections deemed inconvenient to the moment.
Even should this counterattack be stopped in it's tracks this time, this exercise has suggested that a considerable amount of investment money, and an even more considerable customer appetite apparently exists for the formation of an investment vehicle dedicated to reversing the severe excesses of the liberal cabal.
I seriously doubt that the ACLU sprang into existence without several false starts and without a number of people deciding that sufficient willpower can exercise political power. They have since been allowed to decompose into a truly despicable, yet powerful force dedicated to attacking the foundations of America.
I can't see the downside in fielding the idea that we can strike back. Understand, I am not convinced that this particular attempt won't work right now, and I have argued here to that effect. But what I am saying is that we aren't defeated simply if one unsuccessful probing attack proves us in need of more preparation. Before every successful attack, the attackers need to psych themselves up to the realization that they can affect the political landscape, and that getting mad as hell, and deciding that they just aren't going to take it anymore...sounds good. But without efforts to translate that anger into a steely determination that brushes aside all of the naysayers, and at least attempts to kick the chair legs out from under 5 monomaniacal justices, we really do no more than just mutter under our breath to no one in particular, as several posters have pointed out.
I posit that even the very attempt to resist these leftist justices will eventually, against even the best designed media embargo, leak out to the American voter and begin to alert them that something is terribly wrong with the Supreme Court. That these arcane sounding arguments like "eminent domain" are damned important to whether their children are eventually assigned housing by government committee, or instead enjoy, as we have, the foundation of freedom that private property is.
Now, more than ever, we need to seize the initiative in the propaganda war over conservative nominees to the Supreme Court, and change the MSM manufactured perception that the extremists are the ones who want to return the country to the protections of the Constitution, and thus induce the average, somnolent voter to take a look at who the real extremists are.
We need to realize that setbacks aren't necessarily a defeat, if they serve the purpose of moving public opinion by turning on the kitchen light to expose the roaches.
I submit that this very act of throwing the tea into the harbor may not repeal the tax, but will surely place the citizenry on notice that all is not well in the Republic.
And that despite the conspicuous lack of polling on the seizure and redistribution of private property... we are not all asleep.