Nonsense. Your rule vs. my history, blabla ad nauseum.
There is a difference between being a client of terrorism and being a terrorist, and being an actual manipulator of those.
The West might have been a client of the mujahedins, that does not make their master.
The Soviets are under valid suspicion of mastering terrorism under Andropov.
Muslims are obvious clients of Soviet power struggle provocations and manipulations.
Why would they abandon such a cheap way to power?
They did not, none would, and that is their excuse for continuing today.
This thread is an example of my power over your power, my expertise over yours. It's good stuff for revolution. And you are part and parcel and major instigator of it.
Muslims are obvious clients of America's Cold War covert effort against the Soviets (example: Iran-Contra - Saudi Money - Sultan of Brunei money).
The Soviets backed clients who were secular Arabs/Muslims like the PLO which was made up of nationalists who were secular Muslims/Christains and socialist atheist Arabs.