Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"I think this was in reference to Lott and Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld had the gonads to address military problems which not only affect us today but in the long term. Like Bush, he didn't care what was thought of him in his actions, he was a leader doing what needed to be done. Lott was/is attempting to asses blame on his own problems/inabilities to lead on Rumsfeld rather than blaming the liberals for what they are and what they did.

You're right. I should have included this part of his commentary also, because it makes that point clear:

Rush: "Instead of piling on Rumsfeld, why don't you and the Senate leadership get together and realize it's the Democrats in the Senate who are the enemy, and not Rumsfeld. That it's Al-Qaeda who is the enemy, and not Rumsfeld.

And just because McCain decides to fly off the cliff for personal reasons doesn't mean you have to follow him. ...."

20 posted on 06/25/2005 11:56:09 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Macroevolution is the last of the great 19th century mystery religions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Matchett-PI
I found this
21 posted on 06/25/2005 12:08:31 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection (http://hour9.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson