Do you even know what ad hominem means? You certainly don't know how to support an argument. See, in a logical argument, you need facts to support your conclusion. You have nothing to support your odd contention that VDH is some cult leader...or follower, whichever. Nothing but an invite to us to Google, which is like me telling you Bill Clinton is on LSD, and claiming I supported it by saying you should google "LSD" and "Clinton."
I have been given no cause to doubt VDH, who is widely respected here on FR and in the real world, based upon your fanciful 'attacks.' If you'd given me any, I'd consider investigating.
As it stands, instead of defending VDH, I'll just laugh at you. You're kinda funny, not in a telling-a-joke way, but in a being-a-joke way.
Maybe I shouldn't do that, though. After all, I'm due at my postmodernist cult meeting, the one at Victor Davis Hanson's house, where we all worship positive thinking and put off good vibes and get all wacky and stuff. /sarc
hey, check his profile. He's a teacher.
That kind of explains everything. "I know what I'm talking about. I don't need to check my facts. Even though everyone is telling me I'm wrong, it just means that everyone else is wrong!"
If I got by butt handed to me the way he did I this thread, I'd retire my screen name in shame and quietly sign up for another.
Thats gonna leave a mark.
Uhhhh... " D'you want grits with that? "