Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
An Amendment is not needed.. Both Congress & the Executive are sworn to obey the Constitution. --
Either branch could issue a 'finding' that public takings for private gain are against basic Constitutional principles that protect individual human rights.

They could urge/authorize that the Justice Dept make available public defenders to citizens facing such infringements by state or local authorities who misuse their power.

Have you forgotten the Schiavo case so soon? There is only one branch of government. That's why you get this ruling. You think you would get this if the Schiavo killing had been stopped despite their "rulings"?

I fail to see any connection between Schiavo and your proposed Amendment.

66 posted on 06/23/2005 3:37:33 PM PDT by musanon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: musanon

And the Supreme Court rules against them and they quietly fade away. Get it now?


67 posted on 06/23/2005 3:54:28 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson