Is that a tongue in cheek theory, or do you really suspect mob, I mean rock involvement?
Greta's blog:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161025,00.html
EXCERPT
As you may recall, Mickey was one of the two guards who was arrested on June 5 (the three boys were arrested on June 9.) He is very upset about what happened to him and frankly I don't blame him. But slipping between his upset and the police "rush to judgment" arrest of him is some potentially important information. Mickey was housed in jail for a short time in the cell next to Deepak Kalpoe and spoke to him about Natalee Holloway. It appears Mickey has not volunteered this information to the police (he is mad at them) and the police have not been clever enough to go back and ask him (maybe an apology would help, too.)
Mickey did provide us some info that could be (not saying I am certain it would be) important to the investigation. We aired the interview (and that information) last night. Of course the information that Mickey did provide needs to be checked against his earlier statements to make sure that this is not an embellishment. Nothing should go unchecked — corroboration is powerful to make sure one is on the right track in investigating a case.
I think this island is full of rocks. And people on the island don't want everyone to start looking at the rocks and turning them over.
That is the context in which this occurred. Joran did the deed whatever it was and his father tried to cover for him with the aid of others mostly by footdragging and not responding to the need for an investigation.
Now with the Holloways/ Twittys on the case and the press glaring and people researching, the context is coming up more and more. I am shocked the MSM hasn't discovered what Nita put together so beautifully. That is what the people on Aruba want to avoid.
And Joran will be served up like caviar on toast points by all concerned if the MSM gets into doing exposes on rocks in Aruba.