Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: monkeywrench
I'd have alot of company! The guys a liar! He told his son not to help people looking for their missing daughter. guilty knowledge.

"He told his son not to help people looking for their missing daughter." Are you SURE of that? That sounds to me like a lot of the "facts" bandied about here that turn out not to be facts at all.

It has been widely reported that Mr. vdS told his son to stop volunteering information to the Holloway-Twittys when they showed up unannounced at the vdS house in the wee hours of the morning, early on in this thing.

If that's what happened, I don't find it especially incriminating. (I addressed that in post 3659 and don't want to be repetitive.)

3,679 posted on 06/28/2005 2:16:59 PM PDT by gingersnaps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3670 | View Replies ]


To: gingersnaps

No, he told him to not say a word You make it sound so sweet. It isn't. Not when things are so incriminating. urin was the last to see her. And daddy didn't want him to help.


3,682 posted on 06/28/2005 2:22:02 PM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3679 | View Replies ]

To: gingersnaps

An innocent person would volunteer information to the distraught parents of a missing girl.

An innocent person would assist in the search for a girl he had spent time with and whose company he innocently enjoyed.

An innocent person would not concoct a tale about two black security guards.

The actions of the Van der Sloots, father and son, do indeed indicate a "consciousness of guilt" to any reasonable person.


3,684 posted on 06/28/2005 2:24:36 PM PDT by Palladin (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3679 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson