To: redgolum; pbrown
...turning it over to a private developer is an acceptable way to use eminent domain, if that transfer would be to a use that generates more tax income. You or I could constitute a "private developer" if the home we were going to build brought in more revenue than the current occupant.
878 posted on
06/23/2005 1:59:02 PM PDT by
Just A Nobody
(I - L O V E - my attitude problem!)
To: Justanobody
You or I could constitute a "private developer" if the home we were going to build brought in more revenue than the current occupant.Good heavens. I'm still in shock over this ruling and it's only getting worse by the minute.
879 posted on
06/23/2005 2:01:18 PM PDT by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: Justanobody
You or I could constitute a "private developer" if the home we were going to build brought in more revenue than the current occupant. If we had the money, and said to the county "Hey, let me get all of those houses and I will build a nice condo that will generate $x more taxes", yes we could.
889 posted on
06/23/2005 2:09:54 PM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson