Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: janetjanet998

so there is no right to private ownership, but we should allow the flag to be burned for fear of abridging free speach?

silly libs. they are sofa king retarded.


750 posted on 06/23/2005 12:24:06 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies ]


To: jw777

When the armed men wearing flag patches on their shoulders show up to take your house, will you still want to save the flag from being burned?


758 posted on 06/23/2005 12:28:22 PM PDT by Haru Hara Haruko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies ]

To: jw777
The Supreme Court has ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not prevent local governments from seizing property for this reason.

Yes so according to the court it is constitutionally OK to seize property in this manner. So what would prevent a developer from challenging the constitutionality of a law that prohibits such seizure.


The 5th and 4th amendment should trump any local laws that greedy council members can cook up. Otherwise your town could pass an ordinance that strikes down every person's right to a trial by a jury of peers. Or what about summary execution via dismemberment without trial, because the town elders say so.

The SCOTUS is supposed to be the last defense of the individual against the tyranny of the state, and it has failed.
779 posted on 06/23/2005 12:43:40 PM PDT by boofus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson