Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Helmholtz

Who were the 5?


16 posted on 06/23/2005 7:43:44 AM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nuffsenuff

John Paul Stevens authored the opinion - dunno who the other four are yet (it was 5-4).


20 posted on 06/23/2005 7:45:10 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: nuffsenuff

The usual suspects plus Kennedy.


110 posted on 06/23/2005 8:11:33 AM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: nuffsenuff

Who do you think? The only question is, who was the fourth?


120 posted on 06/23/2005 8:13:16 AM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: nuffsenuff; rushmom; AmishDude; AntiGuv

The five distinguished judges were:

Stevens
Kennedy
Souter
Ginsburg
Breyer

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/23/scotus.property.ap/index.html


128 posted on 06/23/2005 8:16:05 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (I think I'll have the Orange Glazed Chicken Entree today - Here at CLUB GITMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: nuffsenuff
Who were the 5?

I'm sure your guess would be right on, or should I say left on?

364 posted on 06/23/2005 9:18:39 AM PDT by b4its2late (FOOTBALL REFEREES: Best seat in the house, and we're paid to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: nuffsenuff

[From WSJ] "Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority. He was joined by Justice Anthony Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer.

At issue was the scope of the Fifth Amendment, which allows governments to take private property through eminent domain if the land is for "public use" and if "just compensation" is provided.
***
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has been a key swing vote on many cases before the court, issued a stinging dissent. She argued that cities shouldn't have unlimited authority to uproot families, even if they are provided compensation, simply to accommodate wealthy developers.
***
"Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random," Justice O'Connor wrote. "The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms."

She was joined in her opinion by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, as well as Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. (Kelo et al v. City of New London)"


582 posted on 06/23/2005 11:00:49 AM PDT by docbnj (There are just three good judges, joined in the this case by O'Connor (to her credit).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson