Now let me see...
Just how does that Declaration of Independence go?
Is it time to do it again?
This ruling is looking more and more like a reaffirmation of the Dayton Mining v. Seawell (1876) case that the ruling cited.
Obviously, if ED is invoked haphazardly, officials should be thrown out on their ear. What's to say that couldn't OR wouldn't happen if some houses were taken for a Wal-Mart? I know I'd fight like hell.