Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07

I take it the two prior decisions on blight and oligopoly are equally unconsitutional in your view. If so, that is certainly a defensible position (and if SCOTUS went that way, we might need a Constitutional amendment). But the Sandra Day distinctions in reading her dissent drove me nuts. They just don't do anything for me.


1,133 posted on 06/23/2005 7:04:50 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1029 | View Replies ]


To: Torie

Absolutely they are unconstitutional. They are expanding on unconstitutional precedent which has been my argument here for many years. From first trimester to killling them on the way out, they never contract they expand. Enough is enough my friend. Fort Trumbull is not a "blighted" area nor is New London. It is middle class for cripes sake and even if it wasn't the 5th gives government no power play Robin Hood, Prince John or Attilla the Hun.


1,144 posted on 06/23/2005 7:12:08 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson