Maybe we could get the D.C. govenment to condemn one of the 5 SCOTUS judge's house and give it to Wal Mart to build a new store. I'd support that. They should have to experience what they just did.
Just reading over the decision, it seems as if the court was unwilling to trump the state precedent for ED already in place. Isn't that the good people of CT's fault for having such a provision in place?