Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: biblewonk

If the reactor reprocessed fuel, as does every other country who has nuclear power, there would be virtually no radio active waste. The aleged reason we do not reprocess is that the waste from the Uranium process is plutonium and could alegedly be stolen by terrorists to make boms. How this is an argument to leave it in pools outside Nuclear facilities I do not know it seems far wiser to process it until it is no longer a threatening material. My only guess is we intend to pack it into war heads should the need arrise.


137 posted on 06/23/2005 5:39:38 AM PDT by kharaku (G3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: kharaku
If the reactor reprocessed fuel, as does every other country who has nuclear power, there would be virtually no radio active waste. The aleged reason we do not reprocess is that the waste from the Uranium process is plutonium and could alegedly be stolen by terrorists to make boms. How this is an argument to leave it in pools outside Nuclear facilities I do not know it seems far wiser to process it until it is no longer a threatening material. My only guess is we intend to pack it into war heads should the need arrise.

Pretty irresponsible isn't it? But it maximized profits.

142 posted on 06/23/2005 5:52:04 AM PDT by biblewonk (Yes I think I am a bible worshipper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson