Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribune7
Well, not all pro-lifers, obviously, but there those who vote pro-life despite not agreeing with you on guns, unions, taxes etc. that would have easily giving Florida to Gore if they hadn't held their noses & pulled the R lever.

Why did they have to hold their noses when Bush is pro-life? With Dole, it is quite possible that it was the pro-lifers not holding their noses and pulling the R lever that was responsible for Clinton getting reelected.

This from somebody that held his nose (literally) and voted for Ellen Craswell for governor (Washington), even though I disagreed with most of her politics. (that was rather funny actually: I held my nose and voted for Craswell. The guy next to me saw me holding my nose and said "Craswell?" I sighed, and said "yep." We both had a laugh at that).

79 posted on 06/21/2005 2:40:09 PM PDT by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: wyattearp
Why did they have to hold their noses when Bush is pro-life?

Most people who are pro-life did not. Most people who are pro-life are conservative on other issues (guns, taxes, affirmative action etc.) or see the GOP as the best chance to uphold our constituion despite the views of a particular candidate.

Many, however, are not. They grew up in homes where the Democratic Party was revered. Abortion, maybe more than anything, cause them to change their view,hence these people have to hold their nose to vote R.

Further there are still many pro-lifers who vote D. Most of these are black.

97 posted on 06/21/2005 4:01:25 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson