Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/17/2005 12:06:22 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: LibWhacker

I already read this yesterday. Re-post it for the day before.


119 posted on 06/17/2005 3:07:42 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (...a sheep in wolf's clothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Its a paradox. If you kill your father, you remove yourself from the timeline. Of course no one in their right mind would be crazy enough to kill themselves. All things being equal, quantum mechanics holds there is a parallel universe in which you don't exist. There's a parallel universe where you're a monster. And so forth. Time travel gives one a temporal headache!

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
133 posted on 06/19/2005 6:41:14 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

In order for this to be true, there can be no free will. What if you went back in time, told your father that nothing could kill him (because he was alive in the future), and your father therefore decided to take wanton risks with life and limb in the knowledge that he could not be killed?


138 posted on 06/19/2005 9:20:37 AM PDT by thoughtomator (The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Have none of these people seen "The Butterfly Effect".

Tampering with the past leads to disaster! Be warned.

141 posted on 06/19/2005 9:34:18 AM PDT by LibKill (Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Paging John Titor!
144 posted on 06/19/2005 9:57:52 AM PDT by Jonx6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I suspect our entire notion of time is an illusion.


145 posted on 06/19/2005 10:11:32 AM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

"people don't suddenly fade into the ether "

Unless they're visiting Aruba...


150 posted on 06/19/2005 10:55:50 AM PDT by HonoluluCharles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

[Inhale...] 'ere.


151 posted on 06/19/2005 10:58:43 AM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

"Looks like "some one" has been watching too much science fiction"- Church Lady C;-)~


155 posted on 06/19/2005 12:00:48 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; FairOpinion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
This topic is from June 2005.

· String Theory ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog messages · bookmark · post new topic ·

162 posted on 02/14/2007 10:03:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Wednesday, February 14, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
My grandfather, who lived to be eighty-three, always said he would never go back and change a thing. I think he believed that all actions run consecutively and that if you change A, you can't have B. And if that was true, he wouldn't be sitting there in his recliner at a ripe old age saying "I'd never change a thing."
165 posted on 02/14/2007 10:18:11 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Interesting. My explanation for the paradox is that while we may be able to travel to the past, we may not be able to interact with it's environment.

The article's theory is probably the better explanation, however.

166 posted on 02/14/2007 10:26:39 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Guilianni is a Liberal who cannot beat Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

could I travel back in time to save a life? like Vince Foster's


167 posted on 02/14/2007 10:30:24 PM PST by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

bump for later


168 posted on 02/14/2007 10:33:17 PM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
If you went back in time and met your teenage parents, you could not split them up and prevent your birth

OK, I buy that - but how about if I met Al Gore Sr and Pauline LaFon and split them up? Or Hugh Rodham and Dorothy Howell? Or Virginia Cassidy and whatever horny bum was around at the time? Would that have worked? Life would be different!

172 posted on 02/14/2007 11:14:35 PM PST by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: timer

Oldie but goodie bump


173 posted on 02/14/2007 11:34:58 PM PST by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Clearly, the present never is changed by mischievous time-travellers: people don't suddenly fade into the ether because a rerun of events has prevented their births - that much is obvious.

Okay. Have to stop there. It is not obvious at all. If mischievous time-travellers changed anything, nobody would ever know.

174 posted on 02/15/2007 12:52:34 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Larry Niven wrote a short story, "Rotating Cylinders and the Possibility of Global Causality Violation". Any civilization that gets close to building a time machine suffers a natural catastrophe that prevents completion.


175 posted on 02/15/2007 1:20:06 AM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

These guys are from the PT Barnum school of flimflammery. There is no such thing as "time" in and of itself, it's KINETIC ENERGY at some rate(t=dKE). Can you think of a "time" event that is NOT a Kinetic Energy event going on at some rate? $1000 in small, unmarked bills in a brown paper bag to the first person to do the demonstration.

Really, you have to laugh at these four flushers. Picture one of them at the high stakes poker table in vegas. Stud poker, 3 players left. Our FOUR FLUSHER is #3 and has 4 spades showing, which wins the hand against the other 2, IF he has a spade in the hole. There is $300,000 in the pot.

So, instead of showing his hole card he goes into this long alternate universe spiel about probabilities, and claims 1/4 of the pot($75,000)because that's the 25% probability that his hole card is a SPADE.

Now, what is the probability that his tied up/living body will be dumped in a hole(as a HOLE card)out in the desert, using a SPADE?


176 posted on 02/15/2007 2:15:11 AM PST by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

We cannot know whether the present has been changed by something happening in time travel because if something is changed then everything is changed including all memories.


177 posted on 02/15/2007 2:20:24 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson