If there was probable cause; e.g., excessive noice, breaking glass, etc., I think the police officers were well within their right to investigate, especially if they were called to this location based on reports from neighbors (I'm making an assumption here).
Of course, if no breathalyzer tests were given, or no pictures taken of the suspects with alcohol in hand, there would seem to be no evidence directly tied to an individual.
I think many of us have been in the situation as these kids. You may not particularly like it at the time, but they were breaking the law, and should pay the consequences if they get caught.
I didn't see anyone allege either of the above conditions here.Maybe I missed it.
Also, the fact that they refused to offer Breathalyzers after being asked means that these cases go bye-bye. The cops involved should be required to pay the court costs IMO.
L L
If they were at the party yet not consuming alcohol, do you think that they should still suffer the consequences?
Upon what would you base administering a breathalyzer test, a field sobriety test? I feel that action would be thrown out of court.
I think that every kid in the house could be charged with being a minor in possession since none of them were of legal drinking age and willingly placed themself in the situation by remaining were alcohol was being consumed illegally.
Furthermore, the fact that people were seen fleeing the site when police arrived certainly gave the police a sound reason to enter the house to determine what activity was taking place that compelled people to flee when police arrived.