The children spend 50/50 time with the parents. The children are all of school age. Tell me why her refusal to provide for the children is justified? There is a difference between being a stay at home mom for the sake of your children and a stay at home mom because you are too lazy to get and keep a job and/or soak father for more money. Fathers are nothing more than paychecks to the family court system. Anybody who says otherwise hasn't been in front of the judge.
I have read that kids need their parents MORE when they are pre-teen and teenagers than when they are little. There may be reasons why she wants to spend more time with them ... perhaps one of them has emotional problems etc. We don't really know
In any case, my point was that the majority her at FR seem to believe that a mom's place is taking care of the children. Yet when one woman wants to do that, the general consensus is against her.
I'm just commenting on the dissonance.