Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Axenolith

Wisconsin's child support guidelines would have dictated roughly equal child support obligations for the parents in this case (Warner would owe a few hundred dollars more, based on his slightly greater income).

Thus, Chen and Warner parted ways without a child support order in place, agreeing that each would simply pay the children's expenses during custodial periods and unusual expenses would be shared equally. Also, Warner would put $400 per month per child in a college savings account.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


According to this he was paying a couple of hundred dollars MORE than his exwife

At the begining their combined incomes were a bit more than half a million. They had three children and the child support is calulated by the wisconson tables as being 29% of one half million which is 145000 which would have been divided roughly in half because he at that time made slightly more than she made so the individual responsibility of the shared support was 72500.That would have been the courts decision using the Wisconson state laws. And the husband was putting 1200 a month away for college expenses in other words, 14400 annually.


102 posted on 06/15/2005 8:45:58 PM PDT by mlmr (CHICKIE-POO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: mlmr

Yea, I meant more also, I thought you were thinking it was already several K more than the wife...


118 posted on 06/16/2005 7:18:47 AM PDT by Axenolith (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson