Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: malakhi
I'm not the one being libelled.

Nobody was libelled, it's not my style.

And I doubt you have deep enough pockets to make a suit against you worthwhile.

Perhaps not but everything in them was earned by the sweat of my own brow as an independent businessman.

But speaking of doubt, there is little doubt in my mind that you support state ordered killings by unusual methods of the severely disabled. Perhaps you have the balls to claim that is libelous and take me to court?

I'd keep an eye on Sean Hannity and possibly Mark Fuhrman, though.

Right, the first amendment doesn't apply to those you disagree with. What a loser.

742 posted on 06/16/2005 9:27:32 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

I have read through this entire thread, and a couple related ones, with growing dismay. I am a newcomer to FR, so perhaps one of you could fill me in. Is this kind of name-calling, sarcasm, and overall disrespect typical here for discussing emotional controversies, or does Schiavo bring out the worst in this forum?


743 posted on 06/16/2005 9:32:00 AM PDT by Ambrianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07
Nobody was libelled, it's not my style.

No, you were careful to tiptoe around the issue without being explicit.

But speaking of doubt, there is little doubt in my mind that you support state ordered killings by unusual methods of the severely disabled. Perhaps you have the balls to claim that is libelous and take me to court?

You are flat-out wrong, but I won't take you to court for expressing your (uninformed and erroneous) opinion.

Right, the first amendment doesn't apply to those you disagree with.

Slander and libel are not protected speech.

746 posted on 06/16/2005 9:42:02 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07

Thanks for your very effective posts here.

Seems we have Michael's relatives or even Michael himself posting here. No wonder the rage by some on FR.

Well, Michael needs to know we see what he is and it is not someone I would ever support. Actions of Michael tell us who he is.

- His care of Terri - no time outside in 3 years, no care for infections, denial of parent visitation.

- His treatment of loving parents of Terri. He could not manage to look beyond his needs to see that Terri might enjoy the loving care of parents, he could not see that the parents love that daughter.

- No - all is about Michael and what he wants. He wants the money, he wants an inconvenient wife dead and he cares not a whit about Terri or her parents or us.

- His treatment of Terri's ashes and burial.

I just do not see anything to respect in his actions. Call me stupid.


773 posted on 06/16/2005 10:32:53 AM PDT by ClancyJ (McCain: "As far as the criticism is concerned, none of us care about public opinion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson