Good post. Hope some can understand the simple thing of love that wishes to help rather than allow a man to freely kill their daughter BASED ON HIS MEMORY OF A STATEMENT SUPPOSEDLY MADE BY TERRI. Only remembered AFTER he received the malpractice settlement which was intended to care for Terri the rest of her life - not to pay for efforts to kill her. Another point that the judge just skirted over in his efforts to help Michael.
Thought judges were to be impartial. Thought both sides were to be treated equally - but that is another point in this 15 year tragedy.
We're supposed to believe this to be a false claim, because it was made seven years after the fact. But the claims that MS abused Terri, made TEN YEARS after the fact, we are supposed to believe to be true?