It does have bearing, though, since the Schindlers encouraged him to 'break the contract', and then tried to use his 'breaking of the contract' as a reason to claim he was conflicted and thus should not have the right to make medical decisions on Terri's behalf.
"It does have bearing, though, since the Schindlers encouraged him to 'break the contract', and then tried to use his 'breaking of the contract' as a reason to claim he was conflicted and thus should not have the right to make medical decisions on Terri's behalf."
Good point, especially in light of the "benefit" they would receive by him violating the contract, and possibly having it broken.
The 2nd DCA said the Schindlers, the parents, were conflicted as well. Seems to me that according to Florida law the next in line for guardianship is TS's brother and sister, not the state.
Get a grip. The parents are doing all in their power to prevent a daughter being killed.
I would do the same or more. If a son-in-law is claiming that my daughter said she wanted to die and I did not believe it, you better believe there will be a fight. Husbands do not always stay in love with a wife, but a parent does not change.
Go on and chastise the parents for each and every action - it just shows you have no comprehension of a parent and the love for a child.