Sorry if you missed the point: Maybe I need to restate them in other, simpler, words if you have to focus so much only on my introductory comments. That way, you may direct your answers to the real issues which were raised:
I am not persuaded by your culture of death.
How did I benefit by her death?
Do you deny that 6 million people died under Hitler? (or maybe it was 5,999,999 but who's counting?)
What part in her dying of dehydration should inspire me to be satisfied that you hold the answers to the right to LIFE issue?
Answers, please?
...Rather than diversionary 'attacks'....thus avoiding an answer....
Are you under the impression that using the terms "culture of death" and "Hitler" aren't "diversinary 'attacks'?"
I don't have a 'culture of death', so your comment is meaningless.
How did I benefit by her death?
Is that how you evaluate the significance of the deaths of others, by how they benefit you? That's a pretty callous outlook.
Do you deny that 6 million people died under Hitler?
What the hell does that have to do with anything?
For the record, I am a Jew. If you wish to accuse me of Holocaust denial, this could get quite interesting.
What part in her dying of dehydration should inspire me to be satisfied that you hold the answers to the right to LIFE issue?
Frankly, I don't give a damn about 'satisfying' you.
Your 'questions' are irrelevant, and your post was borderline incoherent. Now go please go bother somebody else.