Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unbalanced but fair

I believe this is a moral issue and that the technicalities actually are irrelevant. The bottom line to me (as I've stated before) is that it is morally wrong to starve and dehydrate a woman just because we don't like or understand her existence, or she disgusts or frightens us, and her estranged husband with a common law wife and children wants her dead. That to me is simply wrong, and there is nothing that can make it right.


326 posted on 06/15/2005 8:31:27 PM PDT by blueblazes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]


To: blueblazes
So no matter what the situation, you would be against removing life support? And your phrases such as just because we don't like her or understand her existance, or disgusts or frightens us have no basis at all. Where did you get the idea that those were reasons for pulling the feeding tube? And would you be in favor of removing a feeding tube from another patient under other circumstances? And if so, why?
335 posted on 06/15/2005 8:42:36 PM PDT by unbalanced but fair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson